Essay: THE JEWS
Ghandi's Collected Works, Vol 74
Original Sender: Mark M. Mattison <pacifist@netzero.net>
By way of William Thomson <wthomson@umich.edu>
Several letters have been received by me asking me to declare
my
views about the Arab-Jew question in
Palestine and the
persecution of the Jews in Germany. It is not without hesitation
that I venture to offer my views on this very difficult question.
My sympathies are all with the Jews. I have known them intimately
in South Africa. Some of them became
life-long companions.
Through these friends I came to learn much of
their age-long
persecution. They have been the untouchables of Christianity. The
parallel between their treatment by Christians and the treatment
of untouchables by Hindus is very close. Religious sanction
has
been invoked in both cases for the justification of the
inhuman
treatment meted out to them. Apart
from the friendships,
therefore, there is the more common universal
reason for my
sympathy for the Jews.
But my sympathy does not blind me to the requirements of justice.
The cry for the national home for the Jews does not
make much
appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and
the
tenacity with which the Jews have hankered
after return to
Palestine. Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth,
make that country their home where they are born and where
they
earn their livelihood?
Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense
that England
belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong
and
in-human to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going
on in
Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct.
The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it
would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud
Arabs so
that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or
wholly as
their national home.
The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of
the
Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are
French in precisely the same sense that Christians born in France
are French. If the Jews have no home but Palestine,
will they
relish the idea of being forced to leave the other parts of
the
world in which they are settled? Or do they want a double
home
where they can remain at will? This cry for the national
home
affords a colourable justification for the German expulsion
of
the Jews.
But the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no parallel
in history. The tyrants of old never went so mad as Hitler seems
to have gone. And he is doing it with religious zeal. For he
is
propounding a new religion of exclusive and militant nationalism
in the name of which any inhumanity becomes an act of humanity to
be rewarded here and hereafter. The crime of an obviously mad but
intrepid youth is being visited upon
his whole race with
unbelievable ferocity. If there ever could be a justifiable
war
in the name of and for humanity, a war
against Germany, to
prevent the wanton persecution of a
whole race, would be
completely justified. But I do not believe
in any war. A
discussion of the pros and cons of such a
war is therefore
outside my horizon or province.
But if there can be no war against Germany, even for such a crime
as is being committed against the Jews, surely there can
be no
alliance with Germany. How can there be alliance between a nation
which claims to stand for justice and democracy and one which
is
the declared enemy of both? Or is England drifting towards armed
dictatorship and all it means?
Germany is showing to the world how efficiently violence can
be
worked when it is not hampered by any hypocrisy
or weakness
masquerading as humanitarianism. It is also showing how hideous,
terrible and terrifying it looks in its nakedness. Can the
Jews
resist this organized and shameless persecution? Is there a
way
to preserve their self-respect, and not
to feel helpless,
neglected and forlorn? I submit there is. No person who has faith
in a living God need feel helpless or forlorn. Jehovah
of the
Jews is a God more personal than the God of the Christians,
the
Mussalmans or the Hindus, though, as a matter of fact in essence,
He is common to all and one without
a second and beyond
description. But as the Jews attribute personality to
God and
believe that He rules every action of theirs, they ought not
to
feel helpless. If I were a Jew and were born
in Germany and
earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even
as the tallest gentile German may, and challenge him to shoot
me
or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled
or to
submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this, I should
not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance
but
would have confidence that in the end the rest
are bound to
follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept
the
prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off
than
now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner
strength and joy which no number of resolutions
of sympathy
passed in the world outside Germany can. Indeed, even if Britain,
France and America were to declare hostilities against
Germany,
they can bring no inner joy, no inner strength. The
calculated
violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of
the
Jews by way of his first answer to the
declaration of such
hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could
be prepared for
voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could
be
turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy
that Jehovah had
wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant.
For to the godfearing, death has no terror. It is a joyful sleep
to be followed by a waking that would be all the more refreshing
for the long sleep.
It is hardly necessary for me to point out that it is easier for
the Jews than for the Czechs to follow my prescription. And they
have in the Indian satyagraha campaign in South Africa an
exact
parallel. There the Indians occupied precisely the
same place
that the Jews occupy in Germany. The persecution
had also a
religious tinge. President Kruger used to say that
the white
Christians were the chosen of God and Indians
were inferior
beings created to serve the whites. A fundamental clause in
the
Transvaal constitution was that there should
be no equality
between the whites and coloured races including Asiatics.
There
too the Indians were consigned to ghettos described as locations.
The other disabilities were almost of the same type as those
of
the Jews in Germany. The Indians, a mere handful,
resorted to
satyagraha without any backing from the world outside
or the
Indian Government. Indeed the British officials tried to dissuade
the satya-grahis from their contemplated step. World opinion
and
the Indian Government came to their aid after eight
years of
fighting. And that too was by way of diplomatic pressure not of a
threat of war.
But the Jews of Germany can offer satyagraha under
infinitely
better auspices than the Indians of South Africa. The Jews are
a
compact, homogeneous community in Germany. They are
far more
gifted than the Indians of South Africa. And they have organized
world opinion behind them. I am convinced that if someone
with
courage and vision can arise among them to lead them
in non-
violent action, the winter of their despair can in the twinkling
of an eye be turned into the summer of hope. And what has
today
become a degrading man-hunt can be turned
into a calm and
determined stand offered by unarmed men and women possessing
the
strength of suffering given to them by Jehovah. It will be then a
truly religious resistance offered against the godless
fury of
dehumanized man. The German Jews will score a lasting
victory
over the German gentiles in the sense
that they will have
converted the latter to an appreciation of human dignity.
They
will have rendered service to fellow-Germans and
proved their
title to be the real Germans as against those
who are today
dragging, however unknowingly, the German name into the mire.
And now a word to the Jews in Palestine. I have no
doubt that
they are going about it the wrong way. The
Palestine of the
Biblical conception is not a geographical tract. It is in
their
hearts. But if they must look to the Palestine of geography
as
their national home, it is wrong to enter it under the shadow
of
the British gun. A religious act cannot be performed with the aid
of the bayonet or the bomb. They can settle in Palestine only
by
the goodwill of the Arabs. They should seek to convert the
Arab
heart. The same God rules the Arab heart who rules
the Jewish
heart. They can offer satyagraha in front of the Arabs and
offer
themselves to be shot or thrown into the Dead Sea without raising
a little finger against them. They will find the world opinion in
their favour in their religious aspiration. There are
hundr-eds
of ways of reasoning with the Arabs, if they will only
discard
the help of the British bayonet. As it is, they are
co-sharers
with the British in despoiling a people who have done no wrong to
them.
I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen the
way of non-violence in resisting what they rightly regarded as an
unwarrantable encroachment upon their country. But according
to
the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing
can be said
against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds.
Let the Jews who claim to be the chosen race prove their title by
choosing the way of non-violence for vindicating their
position
on earth. Every country is their home including Palestine not
by
aggre-ssion but by loving service. A Jewish friend has sent me
a
book called The Jewish Contribution to Civilization
by Cecil
Roth. It gives a record of what the Jews have done to enrich
the
world’s literature, art, music, drama,
science, medicine,
agriculture, etc. Given the will, the Jew can
refuse to be
treated as the outcaste of the
West, to be despised or
patronized. He can command the attention and respect of the world
by being man, the chosen creation of God, instead of being
man
who is fast sinking to the brute and forsaken by God. They
can
add to their many contributions the surpassing contribution
of
non-violent action.
SEGAON, November 20, 1938
Harijan, 26-11-1938
(Vol. 74, pp. 239-242)